MUD Manifesto Part 1
The above statement embraces the assumption that today, Islam is often misportrayed, misunderstood, mispractised. This, the writer asserts, comes from the fact that 'Islam', and its general perception, has beeen hijacked and abused by those of a more extreme persuasion, and those who are adamant on villifying the very word for psychological, economical and religio-sociological gains and objectives. This can be clearly seen from the recent (current?) uproar over the 'Cartoons of the Prophet' incident, the reaction to Hamas taking majority in the recent Palestinian elections, and closer to home, the issue of burial for certain Muslims who had their 'Islamness' questioned which lead to post-earthly (or should we say earthy) repercussions.
The purpose here is not to be preachy. Rather, as earlier blogs explained, Muddy Junction strives to serve as a confluence of knowledge, opinions and references, which would lead to a personal decision-support system in performing 'ijtihad' or individual reasoning. In order to effectively communicate constructive and informed opinions/reasonings, which is evidently sorely lacking, its foundations and basis has to be firm. Consequently, access to the right medium for communication is key.
In that light, what is of paramount importance is this:
Islam needs the right platform/s for communication.
Many may say 'Huh? Well, that is obvious'. But do we have them? Is Islam fairly represented and portrayed? Do we have mouthpieces that have the ability to reach the masses, especially the oft-referred 'silent majority' (which may be refered to as the 'Ho-Hum Club'), many of which would probably fall under the MUD category? Do we strive to be heard, and heard right? Do we meaningfully do anything about the wrongs what are being said?
It would not be a great stretch to assert that the above be answered in the negative. To say that Islam has bad press worldwide would be a grave understatement. Media blackouts on opinions other than those aligned to controllers of the press are dormant. But maybe before we even speak of a platform, what about the ability to communicate?
Malaysians have earned notoriety when it comes to participation in global online forums/newsgroups, which had resulted in them being banned from various platforms of internet-based dicussion. Being a self-confessed abstainer of 'teh tarik debating' that many Muslims here undertake, I was pleasantly surprised of late by some level-headed discussions found on local blogs, the aforementioned Aisehman being a current favourite after a short hiatus. It has to be taken into account, however, that in order to communicate effectively, the target audience and the optimal mode of communication has to be considered. While the written form may arguably be considered historically the most powerful catalyst of thought-change, current methods/medium/platforms/form have to be considered. The MTV/Akademi Fantasia/American Idol/'Dark' Metal/'Female Siblings in Islam'/MP3 Generation's attention require the right medium. After all, as said by Marshall McLuhan, 'The medium is the message'.
That said, the basis of the communication needs to be solid. Using the Quranic verse of 'Let there be no compulsion in religion' (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256) to conveniently justify a stand or perspective, as is often done by a MUD-like organisation, without taking the rest of the Quran or Hadeeth as a basis gives scant acknowledgement to the ability of the MUD to think and use his/her 'aql'. The desire to reach the Truth should always the need to justify. Only then is a MUD's heart open to the true path of Allah.
Looking at the above, there are 3 main points that need to be addressed:
1. The foundations of knowledge, or ability to seek knowledge, has to be strengthened.
2. The ability to reason and discuss, with knowledge, has to be honed.
3. The ability to communicate in the right medium to the right audience, need to be nurtured.
The next posting will discuss the writer's opinion on the 'hows' regarding the above.
Over and out.
